ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS PARASITOLOGIA. Diagnóstico sorológico de erliquiose canina com antígeno brasileiro de Ehrlichia canis. Serological diagnosis of. 5 jun. Introdução Erliquiose Canina Picada do carrapato Conclusão Argélia – Patogenia Hematologia – anemia arregenerativa Diagnóstico Uso. Erliquiose canina. 92 likes. A erliquiose canina é uma importante doença infecciosa transmitida pelo carrapato Rhipicephalus sanguineus (carrapato marrom).
|Published (Last):||10 September 2016|
|PDF File Size:||13.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
BMJ ; Vet Clin Patholv. Molecular and serologic survey of Ehrlichia canisEhrlichia chaffeensisand E.
Serological diagnosis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis with Brazilian antigen of Ehrlichia canis
This result is expected because R. On blood-smear examination and serology, 27 dogs were positive with the first technique and negative with the second, whereas animals were positive with the second technique and negative with the first Figure 1. Serial propagation of Ehrlichia canis in primary canine peripheral blood monocytes cultures.
O cultivo in vitro de E.
Results were compared between diagnostic techniques. Subsequently, to identify the species E. O presente trabalho relata o cultivo in vitro de um isolado de E.
Arthropod-borne pathogens circulating in free-roaming domestic cats in a zoo environment in Brazil. In addition, the IFA can also generate cross-reactivity with other Anaplasmataceae agents.
Rev Bras Parasitol Vetv.
For each house visited, a maximum of two dogs were evaluated. In contrast, the animals studied by Carlos et al. Serologic prevalence of Dirofilaria immintis, Ehrlichia canis and Borrelia burgdorferi infection in Brazil. This may also explain the absence of detection of E. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
This may explain the high seropositivity of these animals. Five milliliters were dispensed into plastic tubes with cnina anticoagulant EDTAand 3 mL was dispensed into tubes without an anticoagulant.
Of the study dogs, J Clin Microbiolv.
Therefore, the low frequency of positive results obtained with the blood smears in this study may be explained by the higher chance of false negatives. Thus, the possibility of contact between dogs, including street dogs, facilitates exposure to the vector of infection and increases the number of positive tests for E.
Rev Bras Parasitol Vet ; 20 1: Non-conditional logistic regression was performed, with the final model created through the output variables of the system backward.
Additionally, dogs from rural areas hada lower probability of acquiring the disease compared with dogs from urban areas, a result that was also observed by Aguiar et al. Serological cross-reactivity between and an species in naturally and experimentally infected cattle.
Diagnosis of canine monocytotropic ehrlichiosis: October 02, ; Accepted: Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis CME. Amplification of ehrlichial DNA from dogs 34 months erlichios infection with.
Serological survey on Ehrlichia sp. All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Erlkchiose. Anaplasmataceae in dogs and Acari: Dogs younger than four years of age and those living in rural areas were factors that protected a dog from exposure.
Ehrlichia Rev Bras Parasitol Vet ; 21 1: Rev Bras Cien Vetv. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. Additionally, a peripheral blood smear was obtained from erlichlose ear tip for parasite identification. Studies of canine ehrlichiosis have become the focus of several research programs within Brazil.
In addition to the above mentioned points, because serological testing identifies only antibodies, a positive case on serology may appear negative on PCR testing because of eradication of the Ehrlichia organisms by the immune system.
The dog owners who participated in the study completed an epidemiological questionnaire, from which was acquired information about factors that could act as risk factors for infection, such as the presence of ticks, contact with other dogs, habitat, age, and gender.
Epidemiological data collection The dog owners who participated in the study completed an epidemiological questionnaire, from which was acquired information about factors that could act as risk factors for infection, such as the presence of ticks, contact with other dogs, habitat, age, and gender. Rev Infect Dis ; 10 Suppl 4: This bacterium mainly parasitizes the cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system and causes clinical and hematological abnormalities such as fever, anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, petechial hemorrhages, anemia, and thrombocytopenia MOREIRA et al.
Ehrlichia canis Vet Parasitol ; 95 1: The dog owners were older than 18 years of age and, at the time of the visit, were responsible for the household. Positive dogs were identified by blood smear, serological and molecular tests. Stein A, Raoult D.